Sunday, December 13, 2009

Vive Le Quebec Libre...of NHL Hockey.


Jean Charest, Premier of Quebec, said this week that after talking with Gary Bettman, he is confident NHL hockey will return to Quebec City. “It is going to happen,” said the Premier, citing plans to build a new arena to lure the NHL back to Quebec’s capital city.

Cela est une grande idée Jean. But here’s why it ain’t gonna happen.

1. Population of Quebec City. It has historic battlefields, a beautiful riverside setting, and the largest winter festival in the world. What it doesn’t have is people. According to the 2006 census, there are only 715, 515 people in the metropolitan area of Quebec City, which would make it by far the smallest market in the NHL. (Edmonton is currently the smallest, with 1,034,945, but is still 44% larger than Quebec City.) There simply aren’t enough people in Quebec City to sustain an NHL team. A major arena needs to be filled more than just the 41 times per year that an NHL team would be playing. There also needs to be concerts, trade shows, conventions, etc. I don’t think that Quebec City’s small population would be able to make an arena of this size feasible.

A small population also means the media numbers would be low. With just over 700,000 people, there wouldn't be a significant TV or radio audience. Add to this that any boradcast would most likely be in French only, it would further limit the team from picking up any viewers in the Northeastern US or the Maritimes. While the Flames and Oilers, which don’t have very large population bases either, can draw TV audiences from other parts of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and eastern British Columbia, a Quebec City team would be forced to compete with the Canadiens for any viewers out side of the city itself; a battle I don't see them winning anytime soon.

2. Corporate Money. There isn’t any. Or at least there isn’t enough. Quebec City is a government town, not a center of business and commerce. The majority of people work for the government in one capacity or another. While government jobs offer above average pay scales, government departments or agencies are unable to buy luxury boxes, club seating or even season tickets. Nobody working for the Federal Government ever says, “I have my company’s tickets tonight, wanna go?” And if that did happen, I’m sure most Canadians would be outraged that their tax dollars were going toward hockey tickets. Ottawa has a similar problem being primarily a government town. There aren't nearly as many large corporations as Toronto, Vancouver or Calgary, which means fewers corporate sales, which bring in millions of dollars each year from club seating and luxury suites. There simply are not enough companies in Quebec City that could afford to purchase a luxury suite for $200,000, or buy season tickets in a club section, and the average Joe cannot afford to pay even close to what most companies can pay for these seats.

3. The Arena. Mr Charest says that they will build an NHL calibre arena, capable of hosting not only a hockey team, but also the Winter Olympics. First off, that would be at least seven or eight years away before an arena could be built, and that’s if they started tomorrow. While he may say that his government is willing to pay 200 or 300 million dollars toward an arena, we’ll have to wait and see what the people have to say about it. The people in Quebec might not be too happy seeing so much of their money going toward another arena or stadium. They need only look at Olympic Stadium in Montreal, which ended up costing $1.6 billion, took 30 years to pay off, and is perhaps the biggest white elephant in Canada, no longer being used for anything except one or two Alouette games each year. A new arena in Quebec City would sit empty a lot of the year as well, as their small population wouldn’t be able to fill it.

4. The NHL. Gary Bettman and the National Hockey League, despite what Jean Charest feels, have no interest in moving to Quebec City. For starters, it is far too small a market, lacking both people and corporate money. Secondly, the people in Quebec City are already hockey fans and already follow the NHL. If the Lightning moved from Tampa to Quebec, what few people followed the Lightning would probably stop watching hockey all together, causing the NHL to lose fans. Meanwhile there isn’t any increase by moving to a team to Quebec, as those fans are simply changing their allegiance. On the off, off chance that Quebec ever did receive a team, I would think it would be an expansion team, not through a relocation, which leads to the final reason. After fighting so hard to keep the NHL in Phoenix, why would they suddenly let another franchise pick up stakes and move to Quebec City? The answer is they wouldn’t and they won’t.



There is a reason that the Nordiques moved in the first place. They weren’t viable 15 years ago, and there’s no reason to think they would be viable in 2010. The list of cities that will be home to an NHL franchise before Quebec City is long; Hamilton, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Houston, Seattle, Portland, Hartford and Milwaukee. All have larger populations, better arenas and more money, and if by chance a team relocated, it would be to one of these cities before Quebec City.


photo from http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/nordiques-uniform.jpg

3 comments:

toddvaughan said...

The only way a team is going to Quebec city would be an entire reorganization of the league. With the obvious problem of putting more teams in the sunbelt comes the notion that the league could survive better with a cutting down of the number of teams as well as the location. Dont you think a league like this makes more sense then what we have now
Northern Conference:
Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Winnipeg, Toronto*2, Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec City, Hamilton
Southern
Detroit, Chicago, Boston, New York*2, Los Angeles, Dallas, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, St. Louis

Teams that could actually survive with support and conference that inspire nationality...the NHL cant survive on the Basketball model because it doesnt have the appeal the average american
Therefore rather then fight for markets they wont win(much like the MLS is attempting and failing) they could put double focus on markets that would support hockey in general...a fans league with local corporate support...it may not be big business but as Edmonton and Calgary can attest too, if a city loves a team, they will ensure they have the money to survive and prosper
Just some thoughts

Newman said...

An interesting take. I agree with the fact that the Sunbelt experiment is long overdue and for the most part does not work. Something needs to be done with all those teams and the main problem is Gary Bettman. How he has kept his job is mind boggling and the NHL will not really prosper until he is ousted. Take the "Winter Classic" game for instance. They schedule it on January 1st, which is "Bowl" day down in the states. He is trying to compete with arguably the second biggest sporting day in the USA next to the super bowl. Its just not smart if you expect Americans to tune into an outdoor hockey game over college football, its a losing battle. Not to mention the mess he made with American TV and not having hockey on ESPN...what a moron!

Unknown said...

toddvaughn: Excellent points. In particular I really like two things you said.

First off, Toronto should definately have two teams. I mean, come on, New York has 3, and Toronto has way more hockey fans.

I also like what you say about hockey trying to be basketball. It can't and shouldn't.

With such a massive reorganization, we might see a team in Quebec City someday, but the way the league is run right now, I don't think it'll ever hapen. Too many reasons for it not to, and not enough for it to.